Smart Urban Governance in Epidemic Control: Practices and Implications of Hangzhou

Wanxia Zhao, Yonghua Zou

Abstract


Appropriate governance tools can facilitate urban governments’ effective responses to crises. Supported by information and communication technologies (ICTs), e-government infrastructure can be employed to achieve smart governance in epidemic control. Examining the case of Hangzhou, this paper discusses the Chinese megacity’s adoption of e-government infrastructure as a means of combating the COVID-19 epidemic and stimulating recovering of the economy. This paper also summarizes several policy implications that may serve as points of reference for other cities when formulating their crisis response strategies. The paper concludes that smart governance rooted in the use of e-government infrastructure has exhibited great potential for public health crisis management.


Keywords


e-government; crisis management; smart governance; epidemic control; COVID-19

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bassetti, Matteo, Antonio Vena, and Daniele Roberto Giacobbe. 2020. The Novel Chinese Coronavirus (2019nCoV) Infections: challenges for fighting the storm. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, e13209.

Campanella, Thomas J. 2006. Urban resilience and the recovery of New Orleans. Journal of the American planning association, 72(2), 141-146.

China Daily. 2019. What does it mean that China's 16 cities have a population of over 10 million? Retrieved from https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1640618561147122035&wfr=spider&for=pc. (Accessed on Feb 10, 2020)

Comfort, Louise K. 2006. Cities at risk: Hurricane Katrina and the drowning of New Orleans. Urban Affairs Review, 41(4), 501-516.

Drapalova, Eliska, and Kai Wegrich. 2020. Who governs 4.0? Varieties of smart cities. Public Management Review, 1-19.

Gao, Sheng, Darka Mioc, Francois Anton, Xiaolun Yi, and David J. Coleman. 2008. Online GIS services for mapping and sharing disease information. International Journal of Health Geographics, 7(1), 8.

Glasmeier, Amy, and Susan Christopherson. 2015. Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3-12.

Heymann, David L. 2020. Data sharing and outbreaks: best practice exemplified. The Lancet. 1-2

Huang, Biao, & Jianxing Yu. 2019. Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: The Case of “Visit Once” Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24(3), 513-532.

Liu, Xinping and Lei Zheng. 2018. Cross-departmental collaboration in one-stop service center for smart governance in China: Factors, strategies and effectiveness. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S54-S60.

Massaro, Emanuele, Daniel Kondor, and Carlo Ratti. 2019. Assessing the interplay between human mobility and mosquito borne diseases in urban environments. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1-13.

Meijer, Albert, and Marcel Thaens. 2018. Quantified street: Smart governance of urban safety. Information polity, 23(1), 29-41.

Neiderud, Carl-Johan. 2015. How urbanization affects the epidemiology of emerging infectious diseases. Infection ecology & epidemiology, 5(1), 27060.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2011. Historical census of housing tables—Units in structure. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/units.html (Accessed on February 2, 2020).

Waugh Jr, William L., and Gregory Streib. 2006. Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public administration review, 66, 131-140.

Zook, Matthew. 2017. Crowd-sourcing the smart city: Using big geosocial media metrics in urban governance. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 2053951717694384.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v0i0.238

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Chinese Public Administration Review (ISSN 1539-6754, Online ISSN 2573-1483)  is published by the Institute for Public Service at Suffolk University - Boston.